Simultaneous Orgasms and Other Annoying Literary Tropes
Let’s get one thing straight right now: I’m all over female
orgasms. While I’m not necessarily convinced we should make sex as
orgasm-centric as we do, I’m nonetheless a big fan of folks valuing women’s
sexual pleasure. Heck, in my opinion, unless a woman says otherwise, I think pursuing
her orgasm should be a given.
Peeps haven’t always been so big on women’s orgasms. In
fact, Freud popularized the rather – how should I put this delicately? – dumbass notion that
women have two orgasms, clitoral and vaginal, and that only vaginal ones are
truly adult, mature, and womanly. Mature women, he noted smugly, should only
climax through penetration. Heck, even that
malarkey was a step up from the Victorian
belief that sex was one big, necessary evil step in securing procreative orgasms.
Well, men’s orgasms, anyway.
Convenient, that.
Given the cultural history of orgasms, – or, more precisely,
the devaluation of feminine ones -- I dig how most romance novel sheroes almost always achieve
orgasm during lovemaking. Go, Team Woman! It’s definitely a step up from this 1894
advice to young brides: “While sex is at best revolting and at worse rather painful,
it has to be endured, and has been by women since the beginning of time.”
However, I can’t help but think if we’re finally writing
about female orgasms, we also might want to do women a favor and not dress them up
in fairy tale princess clothing. Sure, many women reading these novels want an
escape from partners whose knowledge of female orgasms remains confined to the squawking and flapping of actors with names like Mandi Rugmuncher. But hey, wouldn’t it be kinda cool to provide some escapism
along with enough reality to empower women to acknowledge their right to genuine sexual
pleasure?
The first thing I want to nix in romance novels is simultaneous
orgasms. I have three main problems with them:
1. In romance novels, they usually happen during intercourse and without any
extra stimulation, which lends itself to the tired myth that most women (as per
Freud) can or should have vaginal orgasms. Truth time: 75%
of women cannot achieve orgasm without clitoral stimulation. Sorry, folks –
women have multiple sites of pleasure below their belly buttons.
2. It continues the tired cliché that intercourse is the
ultimate act, the home run, the point of no return. For many women, penetration
is merely one nice platter in the sexual buffet.
3. Simultaneous orgasms? How often does that really happen?
I mean, honestly?*
I get it, I do: Simultaneous orgasms give writers a
shorthand for symbolizing the perfect coming together (yes, you may groan at
the bad pun) of physical and emotional intimacy. Also, I imagine, especially
for writers like me who hate penning sex scenes, it allows us to represent sexual pleasure without breaking down the acts into a mechanical lesson on how to
please one’s partner. It’s difficult, at least for me, to straddle the lines
between sexual intimacy and porn. In this way, simultaneous orgasms can act as an abbreviation
for sexual soul matery.
Except, well, they just don’t happen in real life. Or not
very often, anyway. And it’s not a matter of lack of emotional intimacy; as
mentioned above, it’s sheer biology. Given all the cultural craziness
surrounding women’s jollies, why would we want to saddle women with even more
ridiculous expectations?
While we’re at it, can we also eliminate mentions of feminine
orgasms during intercourse? As I mentioned above, vaginal orgasms are actually
pretty rare, and women have historically suffered when they couldn't achieve them (read: the dreaded “frigid”
label). I think we authors could become superhero activists by realistically
representing women’s sexuality, including reminding our women readers that they
have the right to demand their partners get to work and make sure everyone in
the bedroom finds equal satisfaction.
Studies
say 68% of adult women fake our orgasms. I would like to think that my
novels don’t contribute to the cultural pressure for women to put their partners’
needs above their own.
* Okay, I did a brief Internet search and discovered this very
unscientific poll that found 11% of women report having experienced simultaneous orgasms.
I just read an article the other day in which the author concluded that the reason there is a perceived disparity between the sexes' desire levels is because men are so unskilled at sex, and who the hell wants to have sex with someone who can't please them? Good points here.
ReplyDeleteI've often thought this, LJ. And it's not really men's fault, or at least not entirely. We leave in an androcentric AND a phallocentric culture. Historically, sex has been defined by the actions of penises. Men just aren't taught what to do when their penises either aren't involved or aren't the center of the action. Sadly, neither are women; we have the incentive to learn through personal experimentation.
DeleteWe need better and more honest education. Also, a less androcentric culture wouldn't hurt.
Oops. leave=live
DeleteGo Elle! I second your call for realistic sex. If you can left go of 'what should be,' then the whole experience becomes much more enjoyable for everyone. We'll just have to recreated a whole new cultural expectation!
ReplyDelete